…is equal to the love you take

LOST - "Lost" stars Zuleikha Robinson as Ilana, Nestor Carbonell as Richard Alpert, Emilie de Ravin as Claire, Naveen Andrews as Sayid, Evangeline Lilly as Kate, Josh Holloway as Sawyer, Terry O'Quinn as Locke, Matthew Fox as Jack, Daniel Dae Kim as Jin, Michael Emerson as Ben, Jorge Garcia as Hurley, Yunjin Kim as Sun, Ken Leung as Miles and Jeff Fahey as Frank Lapidus. (ABC/BOB D'AMICO)

118573_D_SUPPER_01aR1

LOST - \"Lost\" stars Zuleikha Robinson as Ilana, Nestor Carbonell as Richard Alpert, Ken Leung as Miles, Naveen Andrews as Sayid, Evangeline Lilly as Kate, Josh Holloway as Sawyer, Terry O\'Quinn as Locke, Matthew Fox as Jack, Daniel Dae Kim as Jin, Yunjin Kim as Sun, Emilie de Ravin as Claire, Michael Emerson as Ben, Jorge Garcia as Hurley and Jeff Fahey as Frank Lapidus. (ABC/BOB D\'AMICO)

118573_D_SUPPER_01b

LOST - \"Lost\" stars Zuleikha Robinson as Ilana, Nestor Carbonell as Richard Alpert, Emilie de Ravin as Claire, Naveen Andrews as Sayid, Evangeline Lilly as Kate, Josh Holloway as Sawyer, Terry O\'Quinn as Locke, Matthew Fox as Jack, Daniel Dae Kim as Jin, Michael Emerson as Ben, Jorge Garcia as Hurley, Yunjin Kim as Sun, Ken Leung as Miles and Jeff Fahey as Frank Lapidus. (ABC/BOB D\'AMICO)

3supper03

Keep clicking on the photos to see them full size.

Photos source: Lyly

Scan the latest Lost image for clues to the final season. Is Locke’s place setting him up as, “He who will save us all?” Or is it just a copy of the infamous BSG portrait?

The picture was released in Us Weekly Magazine. At first glance it looks like just another promo still with no real meaning, especially since the cast members aren’t posing in any significant manner.

Source: Full Article @ IO9

I’m not one to get into the hidden meanings in LOST as I learned long ago that the so-called mysteries can have really dumb meanings. For example: Does anyone besides the die-hard clue-hunters recall what ‘the numbers’ ultimate meaning is? No? And yet it was a be-all, end-all focus for seasons. They mean zip in the scheme of things. I believe their meaning  was not revealed in a canonical way–that is they were not revealed on the show as broadcast. They were part of a LOST game, I think. So perhaps I’m being cynical and they will, ultimately matter. Not holding my breath.

Related posts

• LOST Finale SPOILERS – Body Count – E6.14 SPOILERS – HD Promo Photos & Screen Caps – Interview w/Jacob (0)
• LOST Season 6 Sky1 HD Promo (01.29.10) – Terry O’Quinn WMMR Radio Interview (01.28.10) (0)
• LOST – 6×08 “Recon” Sneak Peek#1 “It’s all I had” Official Promo Photos/Evangeline Lilly Speaks About Claire and Kate Reunion/LOST TVGuide scans (0)
• LOST – ‘What They Died For’ (6×16) Promo #1 US & CDN – Sneak Peek #1 – Young Jacob Wants Something From Hurley (0)
• Update! LOST – Emilie de Ravin Interview with MTV *SPOILERS* – Episode 6.01 & 6.02 – LA X – ABC Press Release – Jeff Fahey – ‘Last Supper’ Reveal (0)

4 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

1. 

   rc

   Do they really HAVE to play with our heads?
   It’s not like they need to worry that we won’t tune in come February.
   Some of them don’t have what looks like an avocado on the plate in front of them.

   January 5, 2010 at 9:57 am
2. 

   rc

   Note the 2 peanut butter jars.

   January 5, 2010 at 10:01 am
3. 

   rc

   The piece of “table” Lapidus is leaning on appears to be a photoshopped add on.
   Check the shadows under their chins, not all in the same direction. More photoshopping. Also the angle or brightness of light on their shoulders, see Sayid and Lapius, esp.
   Light peeking out below from behind the backdrop.
   Only 2 Freighter people. Are they really dead? As well as Juliet.
   Someone tell Fahey to button his shirt, please.

   January 5, 2010 at 10:17 am
4. 

   Caprica

   There’s a lot going on in the photos. It’s impossible for me to discern what matters and what doesn’t–does any of it matter or is it another (famous) red herring? Agreed. Of course we’ll tune in–with or without this stuff.

   January 18, 2010 at 5:42 pm