Or maybe it’s the continuous rescue, the superdefense or the moisture surge?

Are they making any difference at all because they are costing me a small fortune?!

About ten years ago I started trying over the counter anti-aging products but a few years in started using Clinique’s anti-aging, puffiness (”puffs”)reducers, dark circles minimizers and fine lines and skin-stresses relievers.

But I’m not happy with Clinique’s refusal to get on board with  the reduce the packaging initiative within the cosmetics industry. They say it’s a part of their branding image and to give it up would mean giving up a large chunk of their image. But don’t they have confidence in their products? I really like most everything I’ve purchased from them as I have really sensitive skin and one product of theirs in particular is the only one of it’s type that I can use effectively.

C’mon Clinique, get with the program. I don’t care if the packaging of my jar of triple action moisturizer doesn’t look like a Christmas gift!  EDIT/ from what I can find on the net, Wikipedia specifically, Clinique is said to currently be “changing” their packaging. I have a bunch of it and only one looks a bit lighter. What they seem to be doing is as they introduce new products they are already in the “changed” packaging. Hmm.

Tags: aging, anti-aging, face creams, moisturizers, skin